Bringing My Baby to Work
January 12, 2010 on 12:00 am | In Children, Economy, Parenting, Working Women, YouTube
Email This Post
When the chips are down, sometimes we have to come up with temporary creative solutions until the crisis passes:
Or watch other videos at youtube.com/DrLaura.
Read transcript here.
TrackBack URIExploiting Kids When Finances Are Tight
November 30, 2009 on 8:00 am | In Children, Economy, Parenting, Reality TV
Email This Post
When times get tough, some folks dig in and just get more creative and try harder. For some parents, when the economy got tough, they got their children to try harder, and I’m not happy about this at all.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the children’s segment of the modeling industry has seen a 50% increase in applicants in the past three years, as parents try to have the kids’ “looks” subsidize the family income. Also contributing to the growing number of mini-models are the reality TV shows featuring children (Toddlers and Tiaras and Little Miss Perfect come to mind).
I think this is a despicable development. Parents there to exploit their children for their own income and ego? The family income should not be put on the back (or should I say “face”) of children whose ages are still in single digits!
The impact on children is horrendous on many levels:
1. They have to deal with rejection at a very early age. Children take these situations quite personally, and don’t understand the frivolity of choices based upon product, the taste of producers and so on.
2. Kids think they are the most important part of the family - exaggerated value makes for a narcissism that will likely haunt that child throughout life, especially when it disappears as they get older and less cute or desired by Hollywood.
3. The child who is the performer becomes the “golden child,” and other children in the family are terribly hurt as their value to the parents (i.e., love) seems to disappear.
4. Kids learn that money and looks are the focal point of life.
5. Small children don’t understand the ramifications of the four items above and can’t really make the choice for themselves as to whether or not to participate (and such participation would change their lives and might not be in their best interests).
Exploiting children for ANY reason is wrong. And that’s that.
TrackBack URITaking Food Out of the Mouths of Call Girls
October 28, 2009 on 12:00 am | In Economy, Feminism, Prostitution, Sexuality, Superfreakonomics
Email This Post
I’m still laughing…I read an article last week in one of the online news reporting sites about a new book on economics, called Superfreakonomics. In the book, the authors discuss the issue of prostitution in today’s economic climate. As it turns out, prostitution was a profitable enterprise (focusing on mainstream sex acts) until the sexual liberation movement in the 1960s changed “the business of intimacy, and a generation of ‘free love’ altered the marketplace forever.” The “modesty traditionally displayed by women in search of Mr. Right evolved to a bold pursuit of Mr. Right Now.” The 1960s genesis of casual sex became prostitution’s direct rival.
So, prices for sex acts plummeted. Hookers had competition from the average woman who would have sex for free (without even getting a dinner out of it). Being entrepreneurial, hookers then began to provide more unconventional sex - the kind of things men can’t get from their girlfriends - and the price for those often depraved acts hauled the fees way back up.
As one call girl said: “Thank God prostitution is illegal, ’cause if it weren’t, I wouldn’t be making $500 an hour; I’d probably be back doing what I was doing, which was working as a computer technician for a Fortune 500 company.” Of course, if you’re the prostitute for a state governor, you’ll probably get lots of media offers!
The call girl entrepreneur who was interviewed was asked whether or not she would suggest this “career” for her daughter. She obfuscated like crazy, saying she hoped it would be only one of many, many options, and then the article ended with the revelation that she’s now quitting prostitution to go to school to study economics. I guess morality finally caught up to her.
This is why I use the term “unpaid whore” for women who shack up with guys, rather than dignify themselves and sexual intimacy with a marital commitment. I tell them that at the very least, they ought to be paid for sex, since it ultimately means nothing profoundly important to him past the orgasm. Now I can mention that they are taking food out of the mouths of prostitutes and their families!!
Women cannot run away from their true nature, and our true nature (apart from any psychological problems) is to nurture and nest. We can act like wild women and say it’s our right and freedom, but I take the calls every day from disillusioned, hurt women who did, in fact, expect love and loyalty from the men they had sex with.
So, ladies, have pity on the call girls and prostitutes. Give them back their turf, and re-elevate womanhood so that men again have a mountain to climb and earn, and therefore value.
TrackBack URI
Should We Tell The Kids We Were Laid Off?
October 6, 2009 on 12:00 am | In Economy, Family, Parenting, YouTube
Email This Post
It’s a common problem in more and more families: pay cuts, reduced work hours, or even complete unemployment. Should the kids know about job losses or not?
Or watch other videos at youtube.com/DrLaura.
Read transcript here.
TrackBack URIThe High Cost of Obesity
July 9, 2009 on 12:00 am | In Economy, Health, Health Insurance, Obesity, Personal Responsibility
Email This Post
It seems that it’s very much in the nature of human nature to expect more without having more expected of us. Because so much energy is being focused on the cost of health care and the proposed programs for universal health insurance, the flip side of the equation is starting to get attention.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention unveiled a free website application last week called LEANWorks, designed to motivate employers to start “healthy living” and weight loss programs for their employees, because being overweight is a major cause of certain illnesses, and also contributes to missed work days and higher insurance costs. Of course, representatives of organizations like the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance are up in arms over this.
A keystone to the LEANWorks program is the “obesity cost calculator” for companies to estimate how much their obese and overweight employees are costing them in higher insurance rates and missed work days each year. The ultimate point is to get preventive programs in place.
Of course, the “fat advocates” don’t want responsibility - just perks. They are claiming everything from prejudice to discrimination. In their view, facts are irrelevant. It’s just their “feelings” that count.
It’s no secret that obesity is a big risk factor for chronic diseases. Obesity has accounted for over 25% of the rise in medical costs between 1987 and 2001, according to Dr. Bill Dietz, Director of the Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity at the CDC. While it is also true that people of normal weight have medical issues which result in work day losses and higher insurance costs, most of their conditions are not as controllable as excess body fat.
It is the moral responsibility of those who are overweight and obese, of those who smoke, of those who abuse alcohol and various drugs to correct their activities for the greater good of the community which has to take on responsibility for the negative consequences of their behavior, and their lack of self-discipline and commitment to health.
If the greater “we” is responsible for taking financial hits in order to cater to the predictable consequences of your actions, then you become accountable to the greater “we,” and we cut out the nonsense about discrimination and prejudice against fat. It isn’t healthy, plain and simple. And now that you think about it, it isn’t fair, either.
TrackBack URITake Credit for Being Credit-Wise
March 19, 2009 on 8:25 am | In Credit Cards, Economy, Money, Personal Responsibility
Email This Post
While it does interfere with the comfortable digestion of my breakfast, I usually watch the morning TV news for twenty minutes or so, just to see if anything important has happened in the world…and I have to watch carefully, as most morning TV shows just consist of cute exchanges, truncated conversations with important people, or the rehashing of stories that have minimal significance but maximum power to pull in an audience. Recently, though, I watched a story about how credit card companies are raising their interest rates to 30%, and how that might border on “usury” - which is supposed to be illegal.
As a young adult, I didn’t even have a credit card. I got my paycheck, put it in the bank, and used checks against what I actually had in my account in order to pay bills. If there was anything over at the end of the month (and if there was, it was very little, as I was making only $11,000 per year as a college professor), I considered it “splurge money” and used it on something stupid. Today, I’ve got lots of credit cards, but never pay any interest, as we pay off the bills in full the day they arrive. Admittedly, in between being a young adult and today, there have been some stupid and/or disastrous times when the use of a credit card put us in debt, and it took effort and pain to pay it off.
I say all this to make it clear that I’ve “been there and done that” like everyone else. And ultimately, I think the answer is: don’t use a credit card unless you have every cent in the bank to back it up. Don’t consider it a credit card at all - consider it a cash card. In fact, you might consider only having a debit card, which means it can only be used in relation to what you have, and not what you wish you had. That way, you won’t have credit charges which can rip apart the fabric of your life.
Here’s another idea: take the time to earn what you want - that special car, a home, jewelry, a vacation - instead of having your folks give you a down payment for a house you can barely afford. Take the time to build your foundation, and when you can finally afford the next step in your life, you’ll feel much more accomplished, proud, special, and downright happy.
TrackBack URIHow About Some “Reverse” Ageism for a Change?
February 25, 2009 on 6:27 am | In Economy, Elderly, Employment
Email This Post
I read in my local paper about a formerly wealthy 90-year-old man who now has a job as a “greeter” in a local store. It seems the company that managed his money was making bad use of Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme and all was lost…especially since this gentleman’s once fully-paid-for home was re-mortgaged to get a third of a million dollars more to invest in this debacle.
Ironically, one of the factors which keeps people alive longer and healthier in mind, body ,and soul is having work, i.e., some purpose and activity not only to occupy their minds and time but to challenge them.
Coincidently, a dear friend of mine owns and runs a lovely hair salon. It seems that every month she complains about the “young thing” at the front desk. It seems young women can’t be counted on to come to work regularly, much less on time and do their jobs as receptionists and appointment bookers. Obviously, this is not one of the highest-paid jobs in the universe, but young people today seem to feel entitled to “more” rather than grateful for “a foot in the door” and potential long-term opportunities.
Here’s where these two stories intersect: I told my friend that she should hire a retired, mature woman who would appreciate the extra money, would like contact with lots of people as colleagues and customers, and would probably love having her hair done for free. The mature woman would appreciate the excitement and daily mission, and my friend would probably get one of the most reliable workers she’s ever envisioned.
Were I hiring right now, I’d be a reverse “ageist” and get somebody with a work history and the maturity to appreciate an opportunity where they can still be important to somebody about something and get paid for it!
TrackBack URIKids Don’t Have To Go To Bed Hungry
December 22, 2008 on 6:00 am | In California, Charity, Children, Dave Ramsey, Economy, Family, Parenting
Email This Post
At a recent media fundraiser, I was asked how a parent in southern California could best tell a child why he or she would have to go to bed hungry. My answer (which was met with some silence) was that in southern California, there is absolutely no reason for any child to go to bed hungry, and that parents should do whatever it takes, legally, to make sure that didn’t happen.
That means going to your local church and other available community resources for temporary assistance, getting some part-time, even menial, work in the evening for some extra income, going to “big box” stores with friends or relatives to pool your resources and buy cheaply in bulk….I could go on and on.
I remember one point in my own family’s life when we went through every pocket of every jacket and pair of pants, every drawer, and every little “box-like” entity in the house to pool together enough money to go to McDonald’s with our son. I remember crying in the mall one day, because we didn’t have enough cash for a second pair of shoes for him. I remember being angry and scared, and I remember hunkering down with my husband to figure out how to solve the problem. I’ve been there.
Dave Ramsey is in print and on just about every television program, giving good advice on what to do about your financial situation. Check him out.
TrackBack URI
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.


