Lockerbie Bomber Treated Like a Hero
August 24, 2009 on 10:00 am | In Court Cases, Lockerbie, Muslim Terrorists, Terrorism, Values, Violence
Email This Post
I am sick to my stomach and soul that Scotland freed the Lockerbie bomber on compassionate grounds, allowing the terminally ill creep to die in his homeland, Libya, and rejecting American pleas for justice in the attack that killed 270 people.
Abdel Baset al-Megrahi served ONLY eight years of his life sentence. Because he’s been diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer, Scottish Judge Secretary MacAskill felt that since “Mr. al-Megrahi now faces a sentence imposed by a higher power,” he should be set free to die in his own bed in Libya. The mass murderer was convicted in 2001 of taking part in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 on December 21, 1988 - just before Christmas. The airliner exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland, and all 259 people aboard and 11 on the ground died when it crashed.
This evil man has been given three months to live, or so the doctors guess. He is being given the luxury of dying in his country, in his town, in his home and with his family. Is that appropriately compassionate? Well, my take is that this is definitely compassionate, but definitely NOT appropriate.
It is an appalling, disgusting, sickening decision made by misguided notions of compassion. Compassion for this man is an insult to all the victims. The compassion should be directed to the victims and the ongoing, permanent suffering of their families. This is misplaced compassion, misdirected compassion, and inappropriate compassion. All the families of the victims got the bits and pieces of their loved ones returned to them in a box. The same should happen to al-Meghari.
Why is this happening? As one wise man once said, “Follow the money…or the oil.” Libya’s leader, Moammar Gadhafi collected al-Megrahi on his private jet. Western energy companies (including Britain’s BP PLC) have moved into Libya in an attempt to tap the country’s vast oil and gas wealth. Gadhafi, as reported by FoxNews.com, has renounced terrorism, dismantled Libya’s secret nuclear program, and accepted his government’s responsibility for the Lockerbie bombing. He has paid compensation to the victim’s families. I don’t know why he wants this vile creature back in Libya to die. Perhaps it’s because there’s more to the story…
When al-Megrahi landed in Tripoli, more than 1,000 young Libyans gathered to welcome him, cheering and waving Libyan flags. You should know that large public gatherings are rare in Libya, and tightly controlled by the government (especially on the tarmac where Gadhafi’s private jet lands). For a country that is supposed to have turned its back on terrorism, protecting, nurturing and celebrating a terrorist murderer is perplexing. Perhaps it means that the roots of Libya are still firmly planted in extremist mentalities. Or maybe it means that, having bowed to economic and political pressure, Libya wished to flex a bicep at the expense of 270 victims and their innumerable family members and friends.
To have put al-Meghari on a plane and then to welcome him as a hero, allowing him to die in peace is, in my opinion, an insult to the values of all civilization which believes that life is precious. He forfeited the preciousness of his life when he thought it righteous to murder, killing men, women and children who didn’t mean him or anyone else any harm.
Shame on Scotland. Shame on Libya. Shame on Scotland again, for not inflicting a death penalty on an unrepentant mass murderer. We do not show the world that we value life when we impose minor consequences on those who devalue and steal lives.
TrackBack URIWomen Gone Wild
August 13, 2009 on 8:12 am | In Craigslist, Infidelity, Violence
Email This Post
Of the people who commented on a recent news story in which several so-called “mistresses” and a wife blindfolded and bound a man and then Krazy Glued his penis to his stomach, 68% of them LAUGHED. They actually LAUGHED at this story.
They wouldn’t have laughed if it were the other way around, i.e., if several men glued a woman’s genitals closed.
I am amazed that these women don’t think they did anything wrong in this attack! I can immediately think of a whole bunch of things, including false imprisonment, assault, sexual assault - and that’s just for starters.
This is the story. The married man from Wisconsin planned to rendezvous with one of his several lovers at a motel. The four women (including his wife) planned to have one of them make that “date” so that then they could ambush him together. One of the women told investigators that she met him online through Craigslist, fell in love (online), and paid for his use of a motel room for the past two months. She, like the others, gave this man money. So, let’s review: these scummy women picked up a guy off the Internet, decided it was “love,” and paid for motel sex and gave him money! And they were expecting what? True romance, honesty, integrity and everlasting love??
I honestly can’t understand why they’re even angry. They brought this on themselves, by acting like they were somewhere between sluts and purchasers of prostitution. During this ugly episode, unbelievably, one of them asked him which woman he loved the most! What does love have to do with any of this? Another threatened to shoot him.
Apparently, his wife knew all about the honeys he had on the side, but instead of hitting the “eject” button, she decided to participate in this assault.
Obviously, he’s a jerk. But now, these women are all possible felons.
TrackBack URIThe Sad Tale of Steve McNair and Sahel Kazemi
July 13, 2009 on 9:10 am | In Commitment, Infidelity, Relationships, Steve McNair, Violence
Email This Post
I get calls all the time from young, emotionally hungry young women (girls, actually), who think that an older, often married, man really loves them. It makes me so sad in my heart to hear these young women denying reality and setting themselves up for hurt.
20 year old Sahel Kazemi thought she had it made in the shade, because a celebrity, a former NFL football star, Steve McNair, took her partying in VIP rooms and on vacations for eight months. She believed him when he got her on his condo bed for sex that he was going to leave his wife of twelve years for her. He didn’t.
And then, one day, she saw some other young thing - probably another girl believing she was the one who was special to McNair. So, one night, when McNair was sitting on his sofa, likely asleep, she shot him twice in the head and twice in the chest. Then she sat down next to him, positioning herself so that she would fall into his lap, and shot herself (according to FoxNews).
Here was an attractive young girl (she had just turned twenty), a teenager, a high school dropout who had moved with a boyfriend at age 17 to Nashville from Florida. When she was 9, her mother was murdered, and, born in Iran, she and her family were persecuted for their religious faith.
This is a lot of turmoil and chaos and hurt for a young girl, and it is sad that so many family members and family friends tell this upbeat story about her, surprised that she would do such a thing. She was clearly emotionally tortured and vulnerable, needy, and naive. Her life began and ended in violence.
Men like McNair make me sick. I am sicker still, reading sycophants talk about his actions on the football field, as though the admiration he earned for running a ball around a field should count for more than the human lives he betrayed. He had a wife, with whom he had two sons, and two more sons from I don’t know where and I don’t know by whom. He was a 36 year old man who had been given great opportunities and huzzahs for his accomplishments. His response was to cater to his childish needs to “do” young women who (without question) would simply adore him.
It is sad that this ended in death for him and a naive and needy girl who believed that without him, there was no purpose in life.
It is sad that, as I speak, older accomplished men in business, politics, clergy, academe, and medicine are doing the exact same thing, in order to fulfill their needs to receive a naive reverence, to feel youthful and important in the reflection of a young woman, or because they feel entitled to spoils because of their celebrity or wealth or power.
I warn young girls every day to live a life of integrity and modesty with morals, so they won’t be used in such a way. Sometimes, though, a girl is so damaged that shortcuts seem the only way.
This time, it resulted in death seeming the only way.
TrackBack URIWhen Are Women Responsible?
March 18, 2009 on 6:00 am | In Child Abuse, Children, Motherhood, Parenting, Personal Responsibility, Violence
Email This Post
I can’t even guess how many times I’ve read about some so-called “mother” leaving her kids in cars to die in the heat, either because she “forgot” she had a child, or she was busy with partying, and then the sympathy goes to….the mother!
The same thing applies to women and their abusive “significant others” (choke). Recently, in North Carolina, a mother left her child in the care of a gang member. She knew he was a gang member when she made him her boyfriend-of-the- month. The self-declared Bloods gang member beat her 2-year-old son to death, with a combination of 41 blows, which ultimately burst his liver and caused his brain to bleed.
According to the report in The News & Observer, the murderer will spend the rest of his life in jail, and there’s no mention of the mother being held on any charges whatsoever: not negligence, not child endangerment….nothing.
When informing me of this story, one of my listeners wrote: “I am incensed that this woman was not fined or jailed as well. I guess our society no longer expects moms to protect their innocent, helpless children. No doubt, this is what the abortion mentality has done to us.”
I thought about her comment, and it holds water. Mothers farm out their kids to daycare, nannies, and baby-sitters. The “feminista” movement talks about women having power, yet treats women as helpless victims of sexual harassment when they get meaningless comments about their butts, and suggests that only men are responsible for domestic violence.
Power and responsibility are two sides of the same coin….or should be. To leave a child with a known, self-acknowledged gang member should be considered a criminal act, because it clearly puts a child in harm’s way.
As a woman and as a mother, I am shocked.
TrackBack URI
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
